A Memorable Flashback
What they were saying about oil twenty-five years ago
While doing research on my
next paper, which is supposed to identify trends worthy of a contrarian
investigation, I stumbled on a gem, courtesy of Google
and the Policy Review (Summer 1986). It is an extract of an article by Werner
Meyer that simply lists “authoritative” quotes from around the time of the
second oil shock, in 1979. Here is a selection of these quotes:
"Even with decontrol of oil prices, we can see a
30 percent to 40 percent decline in domestic oil production." Daniel Yergin
– Sierra July/August 1979
"An already serious energy problem has now
become an energy emergency, an emergency that will persist throughout the
entire 1980s." - Robert Strobaugh
and Daniel Yergin - Foreign Affairs vol.58, no.3,
1979
"World oil prices have only one way to go in the
next decade--up, and probably sharply so." - John Mattill - Editor, Technology Review -December/January
1980
"During 1980 and 1981, for each barrel of oil
newly produced as a result of decontrol, the cost to the U.S. economy could
range from at least $56 per barrel under the most optimistic assumptions, to
about $870 per barrel under assumptions which many experts believe are
realistic...Thus even if decontrol does in fact stimulate a few extra barrels
of oil, the total cost to the economy of those few barrels is so high as to
make decontrol the most nonsensical, irresponsible, and expensive energy supply
strategy imaginable." Energy Action -
"Ronald Reagan brushed aside energy issues
during the campaign, insisting the shortages could be overcome by unleashing
private enterprise. But not even his
most fervent supporters in the energy business share that optimism. Virtually all private forecasts predict
declining domestic oil production and liquid fuel shortages in the next
decade." New York Times -
"There is a dwindling supply of energy
sources. The prices are going to rise in
the future no matter who is President, no matter which party occupies the
administration in
"At present rates of exploitation, the United
States will exhaust its own petroleum reserves in about 10 years..." - Alan Madian - Foreign Policy - Summer 1979
"Any surplus production capacity that individual
OPEC countries may have developed in recent years will almost certainly vanish
by the mid-1980s, perhaps sooner... In 1990 prices, adjusted for future
inflation, oil could be selling for $42 to $55 a barrel." -
"The present oil shortage looks like the start
of a long siege. While the demand for oil keeps growing as world population and
economies expand, supply slows and it is difficult to see where large amounts
of additional oil will come from in the next several years." Leonard Silk - New York Times - June 29.1979
"We're heading into a world of considerably
higher prices. There will be a major impact on housing by 1983, and I'd be
surprised if gasoline is less than $2 per gallon plus whatever inflation
adds." Kenneth
Arrow, Professor of Economics,
"It's obvious that gasoline could reach at least
$2 a gallon after decontrol." Representative John Dingell (D-MI)Chairman,
Subcommittee on Energy and Power – Forbes
"Estimating $1.50 [per gallon of gas] is
totally, totally optimistic." Dan Lundberg, Gasoline price specialist - New York Times -
"Without rationing, gasoline will soon go to $3
a gallon." Senator Dale Bumpers (D-AR) -
àspan> Note:
gasoline prices did not reach $2.00 until 2004
"One thing is for certain: prices will continue
to rise. We're dealing with a scarce,
finite commodity, one that will be running out in a couple of decades. Traditional criteria of supply and demand
don't apply." Charles W. Duncan, Secretary of Energy
-
"We're going to be on the ragged edge for
years."
"With oil, surprises or changes can only go one
way: against us." Paul Frankel
- Petroleum Economics, Ltd. - Dun's Review - April 1980
"The price of oil now seems firmly locked into a
steep upward spiral for the foreseeable future." Business Week
-
"At present rates of consumption,
"In moving towards 1990, the industrialized
countries will be walking an `oil tightrope.' " International Energy
Agency - Energy Conservation 1981
"Most industry observers, however, believe that
this time OPEC will be successful in keeping oil prices from falling." Business Week
-
"Responses that might have been sufficient
between 1974 and 1979 no longer suffice; today the
"We must adopt a system of gasoline rationing
without delay...in a way that demands a fair sacrifice from all
Americans." Senator Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) - New York Times -
"I think it [OPEC] has now become such an
institutionalized structure that it would be very doubtful that anyone could
break it down." President Jimmy Carter - New York Times -
* * *
I have indicated by an arrow
on the graph below the time when these statements were made.
Average Annual Oil Prices (*)

(*) Refiners’ average acquisition cost. Source: Economy.com
As can be seen, the price of
oil (as measured by refiners’ average acquisition cost per barrel) was close to
a six-year peak of just over $35 per barrel
This peak price was to be followed by an
eighteen-year decline (to $13) and would not be surpassed for nearly a quarter
of a century!
The parallel with today’s widespread forecast of an inexorable rise in the price of oil, going forward, is striking. The cherry on the cake is the recent warning by Goldman Sachs economists that oil prices could soon “spike” to $100 per barrel from the current price of about $55. They were followed in short order by several other forecasts of $100 oil and two French economists (Patrick Arthus and Moncef Kaabi), not to be upstaged, have just estimated that the price of oil could reach $380 per barrel by 2015, when the world could be short of 8 million barrels per day.
The following chart compares
the stock market performances of the Dow Jones Index of Integrated Oil
companies with that of the Standard & Poor’s 500 stock market index, over
the last five years.

Oil stocks held up much
better than “the market” in the post-bubble decline and then, after a year or
so of hesitation, they strongly outperformed the market on the way up. After
five years of beating the market, we can assume that the high price of oil is
now at least partly reflected in the price investors are willing to pay for oil
shares.
Finally, I wasn’t able to
retrieve the price-earnings ratios of oil stocks around 1980, in the wake of
the second oil shock. What I remember, however, is that commodities-related
companies, which tend to be highly cyclical, usually sell at low multiples of
peak earnings (typically in the single-digit range). To take just one example,
Exxon Mobil is presently selling at 13.3 times 2005 estimated earnings, after
seeing its earnings more than double in about three years. While this may not
seem high, a reversion of the price-earnings ratio to the single-digit range
could offset much of the earnings progress projected for the next few years.
As a team, Tocqueville
managers tend to be fond of the oil industry, which has been good to us as
investors. By and large, we also subscribe to the long term arguments in favor
of the industry. This includes the explosive growth in demand from
Nevertheless, as Lord Keynes
used to say: “In the long term, we are all dead”.
Any significant, negative
surprise on either the supply or demand side of the oil equation, over the next
few years, could well cause a major correction in the price of oil shares.
François Sicart
April 27, 2005
© Tocqueville Asset Management L.P.
The information contained herein has been obtained
from sources believed to be reliable and to the best of our knowledge is
complete. The validity and completeness however cannot be guaranteed by
Tocqueville Asset Management. Nothing
herein constitutes investment or any other advice and should not be relied upon
as such. This document has been prepared
solely for information purposes and does not constitute an offer or an
invitation to buy or sell securities.
Any reference to past performance is not necessarily a guide to the
future. Tocqueville Asset Management
L.P., their affiliates and their officers, directors, employees, advisors or
members of their families as well as the clients for whom they manage
portfolios; 1) May have positions in securities or options of issuers mentioned
herein and may make purchases or sales of the securities or options while this
publication is in circulation; 2) May hold directorships in corporations
discussed in this publication. The
opinions expressed in this document are those of Tocqueville Asset Management
as of the date of the writing and are subject to change.
